448
submitted 3 weeks ago by Dot@feddit.org to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 3 weeks ago

They will likely revamp the process. The problem is, once the ballot is counted, the vote is separated from the voter, so there's no link to who the person was and who they voted for.

It's a process meant for privacy. That someone was able to accurately forge signatures enough to pass verification (which is handled by trained humans) is a bit on the "this was creepy/planned" side, which is likely how the outlier event happened.

America isn't there yet, but cryptographic hashes anonymizing but connecting a vote to a voter, so the vote could be anonymously recalled for an attack like this would likely be the best privacy-preserving process.

[-] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 16 points 2 weeks ago

99% of Congress is too old to understand a word you just said... Someday it'll all be zoomers, and then maybe tech will start to help us

[-] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe.

Millennials, zoomers and even gen alpha likely won't be much different. There's a difference between understanding how to use technology and understanding the intricacies of technology, understanding how to regulate or use different functions of it. The majority of boomers know how to use a modern phone. They don't know how to properly take care of the phone nor do they understand how it functions, but they know how to use it. A lot of younger people aren't much different.

[-] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

That's true, but where boomers are pig headed about it because they don't want to have admit younger people know more than them, I think millennials and zoomers would be much more willing to accept expert advice

[-] DokPsy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Idk about that majority of boomers know how to use a modern phone. Make calls, text, play candy crush, and go on Facebook, sure but that's hardly knowing how to use it beyond surface level.

[-] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Wait, how exactly could a crypto hash connect a vote to a voter and still be anonymous...

[-] plerwf@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Can identify one way, from voter to vote. If a voter for some valid reason has to re-vote, the hash-id could be used to only count the person's vote with the last timestamp.

[-] diffusive@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

What would you hash, though? The name? The SSN? These are all know plaintexts…

If you want to de-anonymise a vote with any of these you just make a rainbow table of all voters.

Do you add salt? But now salt becomes a secret… how does the secret is picked? Someone centrally? Back to rainbow table. Everyone picks one? Then the voters has to write the hash… at that point there is no benefit with an unique id that is not really anonymous

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
448 points (98.9% liked)

News

23287 readers
3840 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS