1243
submitted 4 weeks ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 43 points 4 weeks ago

Private ownership of a news outlet breaks every definition of "free" in "free press".

A "free press" no longer exists.

[-] Microw@lemm.ee 17 points 4 weeks ago

Eh.. no? Most free press is privately owned. Just not by billionaires who influence the content.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 14 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

When Bozos bought it, this was the exact concern, because there is no ethical billionaire. I'm pretty sure he promised to not interfere with the reporting or content. Turned out to be another lying, selfish asshole with more money than he can ever spend... Who could have predicted that? (besides everyone)

[-] Hugin@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

So government owned news is better?

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 22 points 4 weeks ago

When the billionaires who own the media and the highest level of government are in bed together so long as the government continues to tailor it's policies to ensure that the wealthy stay wealthy, then the line is so blurred it might as well not exist.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

Maybe non-profit would be best. Incentives to encourage good journalism, but not trying to raise the bottom line every year, chopping costs and spamming mass amounts of AI garbage because I'd bet 100 shitty articles is worth more than 1 good article for their bottom line.

Easy access links to the journalists other works, peer reviews from other non-profit and about me profiles can also help people discern bias.

I'm no expert though, so I'm sure someone has tried it and found making money is better for their paychecks

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

What if it already exists, but you, like many others, don't read it and instead continue to passively consume the very media you're complaining about? Making better journalism doesn't mean multiple generations of people hooked on social-media-feed dopamine hits will read it.

[-] kofe@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

I'm subbed to my local NPR's daily top news stories. Highly recommend folks in the US look to see if their local station has a similar program or find the closest one.

[-] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Free press is your uncle's Facebook rants

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
1243 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2589 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS