106
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

It's a language-specific distinction, mostly referring to the temperature and secondarily to what you're cooking (dough vs. others). Other languages deal with it differently. For example:

  • Italian merges "bake" and "cook" into "cuocere" (ho cotto il pane = I've baked the bread), but keeps "roast" distinct as "arrostire" (ho arrostito la carne = I roasted the meat).
  • Portuguese doesn't bother with the distinction. Roast, bake, both are "assar" (assei o pão = I've baked the bread; assei a carne = I've roasted the meat).

You could also say something like "ho arrostito il pane" (lit. "I roasted the bread") in Italian but the meaning is different - you're toasting the bread, not baking it.

In general you'll use a higher temperature when roasting than when baking, but there are a few exceptions - like, pizze are baked, but a pizza baked on low temperature is a sad pizza. For stuff like beef ribs (that are cooked on low temperature) I've seen people using both "baking" and "roasting".

[-] droans@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

But like

Why does my oven have both a bake mode and a roast mode for both regular and convection if I still have to set the temperature on both?

[-] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Check the oven manual to be sure, but odds are that the roasting mode heats the food from the top, to increase browning. While the baking mode heats it from the bottom.

[-] Case@unilem.org 3 points 1 year ago

It also seems to have some context with whether or not it is in an edible state. You bake dough > Turns to bread (food product on its own) > you roast (toast) bread - all based on your understanding.

I would love to be a polyglot, sadly, the only thing besides english I "speak" are scripting languages - and that was hard fought knowledge.

[-] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Or perhaps if there's some underlying transformation? Because technically dough is as edible as raw meat - you can eat both, you'd probably survive, but it's better to eat it cooked. Dunno, sometimes the "boundaries" between words are rather fuzzy.

I would love to be a polyglot, sadly, the only thing besides english I “speak” are scripting languages - and that was hard fought knowledge.

To learn a language is easier but more laborious than people take it for. There's a lot of dumb memorisation, specially when it comes to the vocabulary. Because of that I guess that the best tip that I can give you, in this regard, is to find a purpose for your prospective language, something that makes you say "I need to learn [language] because [reason]". The reason can be as silly as you want for the others, but it needs to be serious for you.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

To add to this, roasting also tends to involve more liquids- like a beef roast is done in its juices, maybe some sort of stock, where baked goods are mostly “dry”

[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

That's really just meats: braising essentially. Roasted vegetables aren't cooked in juices, for example.

[-] dbilitated@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

veggies are more likely to have a higher percentage of water in their composition, though? not disagreeing, just a thought

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

..... vegetables aren't cooked in stock...?

huh. I never knew that. Guess I've been doing it wrong all these years.
The most obvious example of this is a pot roast. personally, I go with the roast, carrots, roasting potatoes, a fine-chopped onion and some fine-chopped fennel bulb. red wine, stock that matches the protein (beef with beef, chicken with chicken, pork with pork.) wine of your choice, and some butter. When everything is done, deglaze the pot, strain the remaining stock and thicken it with either a cornstartch slurry or blond to brown roux for gravy.

you can also do the vegetables separately from the meat, using the stock to enhance and deepen the flavors- for example, a vegetable stock with some wine, garlic, butter and olive oil with both keep the vegetables from drying out under higher heat while accelerating the maillard reaction so they can get that perfect bit of browning on top without overcooking, while the wine adds a bit of lightness to the heavy-savory flavors.

[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

What is generally considered roasted vegetables aren't cooked in liquid. There's nothing wrong with cooking vegetables in liquid, but most people wouldn't call them roasted. Even if the vegetables are in a pot roast.

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
106 points (94.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36055 readers
912 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS