view the rest of the comments
Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
The tough thing is he would never have won a general election, and the Democrat party knew it. That's part of why they shafted him. They still shouldn't have done that though.
Why wouldn't he have been able to win the general election?
Perhaps I have stars in my eyes, but I think he would have.
The man is a Socialist, and most people are afraid of Socialism. Things would need to get really really bad in America for Americans to want such drastic change.
That's a circular argument. You're saying he couldn't be elected, despite his massive popularity, because he's a socialist?
Now would the purple party put a socialist in power? No. Would the people? Yes.
If Bernie was the candidate in 2016, or even 2024, I in my heart truly believe he would have won.
You don't know what a circular argument is ๐คฆ๐พโโ๏ธ
Who says he's that popular outside of the Democratic party?
Aww, that's cute. Who cares? ๐
Thanks for the down votes. You're not the kind of person I want to speak with anymore. Have a good day