16
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 8 points 6 hours ago

Sanders should have president TWICE now, but he got betrayed by his party.... He would have won the election in 2016

[-] UniversalMonk@lemm.ee 3 points 6 hours ago
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 6 hours ago

Yeah the real problem is the incumbent political power structure. Voting is just a garnish after they have already decided everything. It's a broken system. First past the post voting is crippling US politics

[-] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club 2 points 6 hours ago

The tough thing is he would never have won a general election, and the Democrat party knew it. That's part of why they shafted him. They still shouldn't have done that though.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 6 hours ago

Why wouldn't he have been able to win the general election?

Perhaps I have stars in my eyes, but I think he would have.

[-] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club -1 points 3 hours ago

The man is a Socialist, and most people are afraid of Socialism. Things would need to get really really bad in America for Americans to want such drastic change.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

That's a circular argument. You're saying he couldn't be elected, despite his massive popularity, because he's a socialist?

Now would the purple party put a socialist in power? No. Would the people? Yes.

If Bernie was the candidate in 2016, or even 2024, I in my heart truly believe he would have won.

[-] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club 0 points 2 hours ago

You don't know what a circular argument is ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿพโ€โ™‚๏ธ

You're saying he couldn't be elected, despite his massive popularity, because he's a socialist?

Who says he's that popular outside of the Democratic party?

If Bernie was the candidate in 2016, or even 2024, I in my heart truly believe he would have won.

Aww, that's cute. Who cares? ๐Ÿ˜‚

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 2 hours ago

Thanks for the down votes. You're not the kind of person I want to speak with anymore. Have a good day

[-] dontgooglefinderscult -1 points 6 hours ago

If only he did this in 2016 instead of grovelling at the corporate Dems feet and destroying all credibility he built up by trying to gaslight the left into voting for the opposite of his beliefs three elections in a row.

Between his behavior over the last few years and his spotty support of genocide, I don't believe he means these words, he simply wants more money before he dies. I suspect another book release soon.

[-] UniversalMonk@lemm.ee 8 points 6 hours ago

I like Bernie, but to your point, I wasn't happy about how he accepted the Dems steamrolling him over.

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
16 points (94.4% liked)

Conservative

374 readers
190 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS