view the rest of the comments
Politics
For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.
Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only
▪️ Title must match the article headline
▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)
▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.
Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Media owners, CEOs and/or board members
Don't stoop down to a lower level. Throwing a tantrum won't work nor does it look good to decent people
I'm not talking about throwing a tantrum.
It's likely that in the coming years we'll be looking at mid-ranking army officers having to decide whether they want to deploy inside the United States and start shooting Americans, or say fuck it and go rogue along with all the men and women underneath them. Judges and lawyers will be deciding whether they're going to apply obviously insane laws, business as usual, or throw in their hats with the clear facts of justice and cross their fingers that it'll work out. There are going to be a lot of decisions like that, large and small, by people under a lot of pressure and risk without it really being clear what the right thing to do is.
If the model from the top is, "stick with your existing habits and pretend the other side isn't planning to slit your throat as soon as you reach the head of the queue, because it would be inappropriate to deviate from how things are supposed to be," we're even more fucked than the fucked that we were.
Biden could get on TV from the press briefing room and say, "Trump didn't do any kind of transition to us in 2020, and he hasn't complied with any of the laws surrounding how to make a transition now. He's said he wants me imprisoned and on trial for treason. I don't see that holding a transition meeting would be productive in any way. I hope I'm wrong, but it sounds like he's planning to go rogue against the fundamental constitutional principles that underpin our democracy, and I don't plan on being friendly to him for as long as that's the plan."
It's easy for me to sit back and criticize when I'm not in Biden's impossible position. But yes I am criticizing anything that normalizes Trump as the constitutional leader of the US and worthy of continuing the respect and traditional role you would normally give to the person in that position.