1201
Permission (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

This was such a weird time-line switch. Trump president again and progressives on Lemmy sound like r/conservative with law interpretation. So there's no better response, no room for the very real needed evaluation of each situation, just a blanket "shoot em" now. Idk how people are so subjective to propaganda and influence when we have such a hard grasp on reality.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

A bunch of women shooting men for threatening to rape them would definitely get the stand your ground laws changed for the better. Sounds like a progressive win to me.

Reality is a strange bedfellow.

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Just an OG fantasy accelerationist eh? I can dig it, but I think they would dismiss it as not being fit for the definition. Judges can and are allowed to be fickle like that.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

It would be wonderful to set the precedent that men can legally defend themselves but woman can't. Let's hope for fickle justices who can't help themselves.

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
1201 points (97.2% liked)

People Twitter

5220 readers
1659 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS