496
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

New Footage Shows Tesla On Autopilot Crashing Into Police Car After Alerting Driver 150 Times::Six officers who were injured in the crash are suing Tesla despite the fact that the driver was allegedly impaired

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tesla on autopilot/FSD is almost 4 times less likely to be involved in a crash than a human driven Tesla which even then is half as likely to end up in a accident compared to average car. You not liking Musk fortunelately doesn't change these facts.

In the 2nd quarter, we recorded one crash for every 4.41 million miles driven in which drivers were using Autopilot technology (Autosteer and active safety features). For drivers who were not using Autopilot technology (no Autosteer and active safety features), we recorded one crash for every 1.2 million miles driven. By comparison, NHTSA’s most recent data shows that in the United States there is an automobile crash every 484,000 miles.

Source

[-] tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

There is a bias here in the numbers. Teslas are expensive and not everyone is buying them. The lower accident rate can be explained by the different demographic driving the vehicle rather than Teslas being better. For exemple, younger people might be more likely to cause accident because of different factors and they are also less likely to buy a Tesla because they are so expensive. I dont have the numbers for this, but we should all be careful with the claims of Tesla on safety when they compared themself to the global average.

[-] masterairmagic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

The biggest bias is that the data comes from Tesla. Do you think they are going to release something that makes them look bad?

[-] masterairmagic@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

So Tesla says. There is no independent verification of this data. It could all be bullshit.

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

almost 4 times less likely to be involved in a crash than a human driven

Not relevant at all here, when we are discussing occurences that seem so easily and obviously avoidable.

(But it's nice to see that the Fanboi team is awake now)

[-] masterairmagic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tesla fails at basic safety in the most obvious and simple accidents (like this one or the car pileup at San Francisco tunnel).

[-] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We're talking about overall safety here. Even with 99.99% safety rate you're still getting 33000 accidents a year in the US alone. There's always going to be individual incidents to talk about

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We're talking about overall

No.

[-] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz -5 points 1 year ago

Tesla’s are not safe

Yes.

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
496 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59419 readers
3942 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS