211
submitted 4 weeks ago by 0x815@feddit.org to c/europe@feddit.org

Archived link

  • CEOs of European technology companies told CNBC at the Web Summit technology conference this week that the continent should adopt a “Europe-first” approach to tech, after U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s election victory.
  • Andy Yen, CEO of VPN maker Proton, said Europe should “step up” and “be aggressive” to counter U.S. Big Tech firms’ tight grip on many important technologies, such as web browsing, cloud computing, smartphones — and now artificial intelligence.
  • Thomas Plantenga, CEO of Lithuania-based used clothing app Vinted, urged Europe to take the “right choices” to ensure it doesn’t get “left behind.”
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

My miss was somewhat intentional, as I felt you both had some validity to your arguments, and I had wanted to acknowledge you both without looking like I was here to take one side or another, more to try to touch on the similarities you both had to your positions.

Not bringing production of things back to Europe in the current climate I agree would be foolish. Much like with the US trying to secure a future for chip production in our country due to our relations with China be touchy. In that way, it is a positive thing as you say. But it also brings a loss in relations with who we're guarding ourselves against. I'd rather the US improve Chinese relations than put up new walls, and I'm sure at least to an extent, you'd like your country to be able to count on the US more than you can right now. If we succeed in securing domestic production for our respective countries, I still feel we're losing something important, and I think that is what the other commenter was trying to get at, but not doing a great job of putting it into words.

I'm also aware I'm on an EU instance, and especially lately, I know some are tired of hearing opinions from Americans even if we don't support what our pending government wants to do, so I try to tread lightly as possible now while still sharing my thoughts. I want to be respectful and not come off as a know-it-all. There have been so many times America has relied on Europe, I hate to see things getting to the point they're at. While I can't make up for what my government has done or will do, I still want to make and hold onto bonds between us where I can.

[-] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 4 weeks ago

My miss was somewhat intentional, as I felt you both had some validity to your arguments, and I had wanted to acknowledge you both without looking like I was here to take one side or another, more to try to touch on the similarities you both had to your positions.

Then your comment was just bad at conveying that. Maybe next time try and point out what arguments you find valid and why.

I'd rather the US improve Chinese relations

I don't want any democracy under the rule of law legitimize authoritarian and injust regimes by trading them. I don't want to see metaphorical walls either, I'm German and we do have a history with walls (metaphorical and literal ones) after all. But I want to see governments being consequential in fighting for democracy and justice globally. We attempted ”Let's just trade and exchange knowledge and they'll see how much better our system is“ twice before with both Russia and China. How did it work out so far?

I'm sure at least to an extent, you'd like your country to be able to count on the US more than you can right now.

No. I don't want to depend on anyone anymore. I want equal partnerships instead of this weird corporate colonialism.

If we succeed in securing domestic production for our respective countries, I still feel we're losing something important,

And what would that be? What exactly would we lose?

I know some are tired of hearing opinions from Americans even if we don't support what our pending government wants to do,

I don't care where you're from. Neither do I care about labels. I care about arguments, positions, ideas and proposals. Specific, tangible things that can be discussed.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

I guess I'm at a loss for how to discuss a charged topic here right now. Since the election, I seem to get a harsh reception no matter my approach. I've had people get just as frustrated at me for doing what you say I should do. I don't feel it's very productive getting annoyed at someone trying to talk, as it is kinda the purpose of social media, but everyone can do what they feel the need to do.

[-] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago

You want our governments to fight for democracy and justice globally? Wtf? And you are accusing the other guy of being an idealist.

This is just such a misled, outdated view of the world. Your kind of thinking will lead to economic as well as idealistic warfare in the long run.

[-] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

We are already under attack. Economically, ideologically and electronically. It's time to defend ourselves.

[-] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

Fighting for democracy and justice globally doesn’t sound like a defensive strategy.

[-] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago

Human rights are human rights no matter where you live. Ergo they need to be defended no matter where. Otherwise they'd be civil rights or "every person's rights who happens to be in the right place."

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
211 points (96.5% liked)

Europe

1656 readers
571 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS