TP-Link cold feet - go for ubiquiti instead? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 month ago by rehydrate5503@lemmy.world to c/networking@sh.itjust.works

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/21641378

So I just added a TP-Link switch (TL-SG3428X) and access point (EAP670) to my network, using OPNSense for routing, and was previously using a TP-Link SX-3008F switch as an aggregate (which I no longer need). I’m still within the return window for the new switch and access point, and have to admit the sale prices were my main reason with going for these items. I understand there have been recent articles mentioning TP-Link and security risks, so I’m thinking if I should consider returning these, and upping my budget to go for ubiquity? The AP would only be like $30 more for an equivalent, so that’s negligible, but a switch that meets my needs is about 1.6x more, however still only has 2 SFP+ ports, while I need 3 at absolute minimum.

I’m generally happy with the performance, however there is a really annoying bug where if I reboot a device, the switch drops down to 1G speed instead of 10G, and I have to tinker with the settings or reboot the switch to get 10G working again. This is true for the OPNSense uplink, my NAS and workstation. Same thing happened with the 3008F, and support threads on the forums have not been helpful.

In any case, any opinions of switching to ubiquity would be worth it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Eh every vendor goes through security failures, unfortunately.

I mostly have Ubiquiti devices (switch and access points), but I was using the ISP router that had some limitations I didn't like. I have a slightly unusual setup for a home, in that I have a source of backup internet if our primary goes down (primary is FiOS, backup is Starlink - which we usually use only while traveling). So, I wanted a router with two WAN ports, and the only option from Ubiquiti there for a while was the $400 one.

So, I tried a TP-Link router (EAP-605, I think) and it worked okay. The user interface for controlling it wasn't as nice as Ubiquiti's, but it was functional. The router was definitely a lot less expensive than the Ubiquiti one. In the end, Ubiquiti released the UCG Ultra that did what I wanted, and cost far less than $400, so I switched to that and have been happy with it.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Go GL.Inet. OpenWRT shipped in a nice hardware package at better than big brand prices.

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024

2 points (66.7% liked)

networking

2776 readers

1 users here now

Community for discussing enterprise networks and the ensuing chaos that comes after inheriting or building one.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

manifex@sh.itjust.works