61

Note that accounts on both networks must follow the main bridge account to work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

Kinda wish we had actual interoperability standards instead.

[-] Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 3 weeks ago

We have that, it's called ActivityPub. BlueSky wouldn't want that tho, they couldn't control the entire network then, after all.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

If the BlueSky protocol offers tangible benefits over ActivityPub, the BlueSky protocol could become the basis for ActivityPub 2.0. I don't know much about the details, though.

[-] Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 weeks ago

The BlueSky protocol relies on central servers tho, I'm not sure if there's much that ActivityPub can take inspiration from

[-] Twoafros@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Non technical person here, I would love to hear more about how decentralized (or not decentralized) the Bluesky protocol is compared to ActivityPub

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Here is a good blogpost about it

https://taggart-tech.com/20241124-bluesky-questions-pt1/

Check out this mastodon thread and associated links

https://social.wildeboer.net/@jwildeboer/113504285308484716

TL;DR Bluesky is not functionally federated nor decentralized, it is dubious if it ever will be and the layer of post sorting and moderation required to participate in Bluesky's network is extremely computationally intensive and this aspect of Bluesky is NOT open source and is a proprietary black box.

The fediverse and activity pub are the future, even if the current hype train leaving the station (..who is paying for all the free drinks on that train and why?) makes it feel otherwise in the short term.

[-] Glasgow@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

The lack of account portability means activitypub is unsuitable for both bsky and just in general.

[-] Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 weeks ago

They could have also worked to implement that into ActivityPub but they still chose to reinvent the wheel

[-] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah, bluesky has a bunch of features, notably account portability, which was specifically designed into the ATProtocol.

The purpose of the ATProtocol was never to federate with Activitypub, it was to build a more feature rich and scalable “federated” protocol.

Read More

this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

28739 readers
129 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS