1732
Poor guy (i.imgur.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 101 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So, essentially, really poorly written malware? Given the number of assumptions it makes without any sort of robustness around system configuration it's about as good as any first-pass bash script.

It'd be a stretch to call it malware, it's probably an outright fabrication to call it a virus.

[-] excel@lemmy.megumin.org 30 points 1 year ago

So you’re saying it’s about as robust as a typical Linux application then?

[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

Packagers job to make it fit their distro, innit?

[-] GentooPhysicist@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

As a package maintainer, it's a lot of fun sometimes!

[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I bet, both ironically and genuinely, depending on the cade. Flatpak must feel like a godsend to a lot of people haha

[-] GentooPhysicist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I've actually never used flatpak, I still prefer distro-specific package managers

[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Flatpak is really nice imo. You can have stable distro with up-to-date apps. And sandboxing for proprietary stuff, which is really nice.

[-] Vittelius@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Username checks out

[-] rikudou 1 points 1 year ago

They're great! Otherwise I would have to install some random deb from github which obviously doesn't get automatically updated (for example for PrusaSlicer which is my most used flatpak). Though I'm not sure it's something you'll appreciate given your username.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
1732 points (98.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

32054 readers
1576 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS