Imagine trying to understand different perspectives.
Critical thinking really is dead if this is the kind of attitude you think is acceptable.
Imagine trying to understand different perspectives.
Critical thinking really is dead if this is the kind of attitude you think is acceptable.
I mean, rule of law doesn't matter anymore anyways.
So... The states could just ... Ignore it? Just like the fed has been.
We don't need people that push a divisive narrative and push us away from each other.
This is the kind of shit astroturfing bots do, and it works, it's toxic AF.
GTFO out of here with this kind of toxic gatekeeping bullshit please.
Back to reddit with you!
Don't forget actual laws passing in poorly educated state legislatures banning "chem trails" 🤦
Moving/copying/reading/deleting tonnes of tiny files isn’t significantly faster on an ssd because the requirements for doing so are not limited by HDDs in the first place.
You mean the physical actuator moving a read/write head over a spinning platter? Which limits its traversal speed over its physical media? Which severely hampers its ability to read data from random locations?
You mean that kind of limitation? The kind of limitation that is A core part of how a hard drive works?
That?
I would highly recommend that you learn what a hard drive is before you start commenting about its its performance characteristics. 🤦🤦🤦
For everyone else in the thread, remember that arguing with an idiot is always a losing battle because they will drag you down to their level and win with experience.
This is like asking for a source for common sense statements.
HDDs are pretty terrible at random IO, which is what reading many small files tends to be. This is because they have a literal mechanical arm with a tiny magnet on the end that needs to move around to read sectors on a spinning platter. The physical limitations of how quickly the read right head can traverse limits it's random I/O capabilities.
This makes hard drives, abysmal, at random I/O. And why defragmenting is a thing.
This is common knowledge for anyone in it and easy knowledge to obtain by reading a Wikipedia page.
SSDs are great at random I/O. They do not have physical components that need to move in order to read from random locations they generally perform equally as well from reading any location. Meaning their random I/O capabilities are significantly better.
No, I shouldn't know, IDFC.
Let's have some actually useful YSK and not celebrity birthdays.
Literally the bike bell is a courtesy to let you know someone is there to avoid collision, it's not to force you out of the way. At least that's how it is for me. Sharing the path you're on is a shared expectation regardless of if it's another walker, runner, someone on roller blades, a skateboard, or a bike.
My toddler has a little bell for this reason, and you can get bent if you expect me to put a 4 year old on a busy street.
Don't be a dick is the first rule, and you're already failing by being so self centered around shared pathways.
Plenty of paths, the same width as your sidewalk, are MEANT for all pedestrians, including bikes. And we get a long just fine.
And since your city doesn't have safe pedestrian oriented infrastructure, like one with dedicated walking & cycling paths. Bikes are forced onto sidewalks.
If we had control over the weak force:
I mean, with control over matter like that, at the scale of electricity, Star Trek matter replicators would be a thing.
Yes, optimizing thinness is the antithesis of increased battery life.
Your arguing with someone who's head is far too deep in their own ass to actually understand what you're saying.
It's frustrating, very frustrating, that this is the lowest common denominator on the Internet today. And it's only getting worse as kids grow up under the thumb of their corporate spoon fed news feeds.