How is BlueSky any different from other major social media platforms? (lemm.ee)

submitted 3 weeks ago by meep_launcher@lemm.ee to c/outoftheloop@lemmy.world

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So I thought that BlueSky was set up just like Lemmy in that it was fully decentralized into a sort of "terrorist cell" structure that wasn't focused on profits, but then found out that BlueSky has a CEO. Since this is a business, what makes BlueSky fundamentally different from Twitter or Instagram?

I feel like so long as a social media platform exists through monetization (in some form or another private companies need to make money), we are ultimately replacing one dictator with another.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] zoostation@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

I enjoyed Twitter for a long time when it was smaller and ad free and didn't suck, and now I'm enjoying Bluesky while it's smaller and ad free and doesn't suck.

It's unlikely Bluesky could ever suck as much as Twitter and Reddit have come to suck, but if I have to leave Bluesky in a few years for the next one, then so be it.

[-] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 15 points 3 weeks ago

Keep an eye on the interest rate of some relevant central banks. When interests are low, investors have money to spare, and they can even make large rocks float. Once inflation gets out of hand, interest rates respond accordingly, suddenly investors disappear, and rocks begin to sink. That’s exactly when the CEO of SinkingFast Inc. has to make some quick decisions about strategic enshittification.

this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024

28 points (91.2% liked)

Out of the loop

11105 readers

1 users here now

A community that helps people stay up to date with things going on.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

zachimusprime44@lemmy.world