332
Lake depths and heights (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Then go yell at OP about posting a non-map.

There's no lie here, nobody thought lakes are actually finger-shaped in cross-section.

[-] Wolf314159@startrek.website 0 points 1 week ago

Strawman arguments aside, it seems you've already forgotten how this comment chain started. Just let it go.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You're the one being randomly aggressive in an otherwise-friendly conversation.

I had forgotten the cross-sections were already mentioned, that's true. I mentally boiled down what you wrote to "not to scale means inconsistent scale". My point was that if there isn't any inconsistency in vertical scale - which is what I suspect - there's no "lie".

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
332 points (93.9% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3594 readers
43 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS