332
Lake depths and heights
(lemmy.dbzer0.com)
For the map enthused!
Rules:
post relevant content: interesting, informative, and/or pretty maps
be nice
Strawman arguments aside, it seems you've already forgotten how this comment chain started. Just let it go.
You're the one being randomly aggressive in an otherwise-friendly conversation.
I had forgotten the cross-sections were already mentioned, that's true. I mentally boiled down what you wrote to "not to scale means inconsistent scale". My point was that if there isn't any inconsistency in vertical scale - which is what I suspect - there's no "lie".