62
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
62 points (91.9% liked)
politics
18883 readers
4362 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Don't take away people's agency. They've been as capable of seeing all the same antics I have since at least 2016. They're not brainwashed; nobody imprisoned them in a closet and kept them separated from the rest of the world. Nobody took anything away from them. They chose to believe conservative media and MAGA lunacy because they preferred it. If they continue to believe it now, it's probably because they're either too proud to admit they've been so wrong for so long, or they're inside the sunk cost fallacy.
In any event, that's on them personally.
I wouldn't discount the effect that an abusive relationship can have on someone's perception of reality. That's basically how conservative media functions. Their "reality" has become so warped that they think the only one that can be trusted is their abuser and everyone else is out to get them. They are very much brainwashed to not trust anything they hear which is not from a conservative source. They have been conditioned to think everyone is out to get them.
"Abusive relationship," sure, that applies where a victim has some dependency on a perpetrator, where that dependency constitutes a kind of "bondage" of the victim by the perpetrator.
Where is the dependency? What is conservative media providing to these people that they cannot do without, and cannot acquire elsewhere?
The only thing I can think of is acceptance of them as they are, where "as they are" pretty much means "unjustifiably prejudiced in a variety of ways." If they can in any way be described as "being in an abusive relationship," it is predicated on their being shitty people already. If they want "acceptance of them as they are," it is wholly available outside of conservative media, and conservatism altogether - all they need to do is stop being bigots.
If you've got other ideas about what constitutes the dependency, I would love to hear them.
Like many abusive relationships, the dependency is emotional rather than material. They think only conservative media is telling them the truth and everyone else is lying. It's of course the opposite of reality, but they have been tricked into only believing their abuser. I absolutely agree that some are shitty people looking for an excuse, but not all can be written off in this way and it's a mistake to do so.
I cited an emotional dependency above: "acceptance." Your statement that "They think only conservative media is telling them the truth and everyone else is lying" is the outcome of the abusive relationship (if it can be said one exists). It is not the thing which people were initially dependent on separate from being inside an abusive relationship.
I'm entirely open to other notions of why such people could be relieved of responsibility for their own behaviors and thoughts. I haven't heard anything that would make me believe they should.
Not to mention this wouldn't be nearly as hard of an about face if they didn't make it a primary characteristic of their persona. It's why they get pissy when we say "prosecute Biden if he did anything wrong". We don't have the same level of blind fealty to the guy we voted for. He was just the best option we had. Meanwhile, if they can't/don't get to vote for Trump, then it is clearly a condemnation of the voting system that has worked for decades because they can't "lose" to liberals, they're weak and gay.
It's astounding the lengths people go to for that fuckin cheeto...
Read that all back but pretend you are talking about your average cultist. It's not as simple as people make it seem here. This is literally a brainwashed cult. I do not actually believe people can see reason even if they wanted to at this point.
https://kbin.social/m/politics@lemmy.world/t/345067/Hear-what-Republican-voters-have-to-say-after-listening-to#entry-comment-1642695
Well said