1451
Rule (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Korne127@lemmy.world 46 points 6 days ago

I'm genuinely curious; is her hypothesis that macOS users are less tech literate? Because I definitely know much more computer science people that use macOS than Windows (of course most use Linux, but Windows is on third place).

[-] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 31 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I don't understand the correlation with technical people on Mac. Like I DONT GET IT 😭
how can you just be ok with not being able to do stuff you want? I tried to use a cracked iPhone before deciding just to buy a new android because I just bout exploded with the corporate shenanigans apple has.

Edit: It would appear that Mac is very different from IOS. Ive never tried it other than 15 minutes of fiddling with a friends once, nice to know it's not as locked down as IOS is.
Many thanks, but I hardly understand this conversation lol

[-] Shirasho 13 points 6 days ago

The fact I had to use iTunes to put music on my phone and the lack of access to the filesystem were extreme deal breakers for me. There is also the impossible hoops you had to jump through to change ownership of a phone. I gave my mother my old iPhone when I changed to Android and it was impossible to scrub my account from it, even with a factory reset.

The environment felt way too sterile for my liking. It treated me, a legitimate tech savvy user, like a malicious imbecile.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 11 points 6 days ago

It treated me, a legitimate tech savvy user, like a malicious imbecile.

So it's doing security correctly.

[-] Xatolos@reddthat.com 1 points 6 days ago

That's like saying martial law is doing security correctly.

[-] qqq@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I hate this take. That is not how security should look on consumer devices at all and it's one of the ways the security industry is being co-opted to ruin consumer devices. The user is not the attacker on a consumer device. Consumer devices should provide tools to enable strict protections and allow the user to choose. It should be easy to put the device into the fully locked down state at instal/initial provisioning, likely even the default, but it should also be easy to deviate from that during provisioning. After provisioning it should, of course, be incredibly hard or impossible to go from the locked-down state to the nonlocked-down state without wiping data.

[-] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago

Lack of access to the file system? What are you talking about?

[-] jadedwench@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

I think they mean the iPhone. I love my MPB, but I still have no interest in iPhones due to lack of filesystem access, interface for the deranged, and not being able to customize it the way I want.

[-] tyler@programming.dev -3 points 6 days ago

I still don’t know what that means. You can access the filesystem. You can even install a terminal if you want. And if that isn’t enough you can always jailbreak.

[-] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 3 points 6 days ago

you cannot use an app to browse the entire filesystem, every app has its own space and can't access other apps spaces. Even with jailbroken devices there are filesystem limitations related to how they've designed it.

load more comments (48 replies)
load more comments (53 replies)
this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
1451 points (98.7% liked)

196

16708 readers
2151 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS