Astronomer Claims 'Direct Evidence' of Gravity Breaking Down (www.vice.com)

submitted 1 year ago by will_a113@lemmy.ml to c/science@lemmy.ml

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What's that saying again? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence? I don't think we're quite there yet, but for all of you MOdified Newtonian Dynamics fans (and Dark Matter haters) out there here's a bit of good news.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] interolivary@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Huh, this is interesting. I found a slightly more in depth article on this: https://www.universetoday.com/162749/evidence-for-modified-gravity-found-in-the-motions-of-binary-stars/

It'd be amazing if this actually led to something MoNDish being the prevalent theory of gravity. Wouldn't that essentially explain dark matter?

[-] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It could explain the observations of the orbits of stars around galactic centers that currently can't be explained (stars move faster than current models predict), yes. It would be an alternate explanation for this anomaly than dark matter, which is the other proposed "if this exists, it would explain what we see" hypothesis.

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023

89 points (91.6% liked)

Science

13216 readers

21 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml