998
nuclear (mander.xyz)
submitted 3 days ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
151 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

anywhere from thousands of years to millions of years

only in a strictly thermal reactor environment, if you're using a fast reactor, something like the SSR that is currently being worked on in canada, it can both burn waste, and reduce it's lifespan to a much more reasonable length.

As always, development is the problem, if we had more energy being focused on this, we would be farther along, but such is scientific development.

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
998 points (96.9% liked)

Science Memes

11399 readers
947 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sal@mander.xyz
fossilesque@mander.xyz
SciBot@mander.xyz