14

This is worth delurking for.

A ficus-lover on the forums for iNaturalist (where people crowdsource identifications of nature pics) is clearly brain-poisoned by LW or their ilk, and perforce doesn't understand why the bug-loving iNat crew don't agree that

inaturalist should be a market, so that our preferences, as revealed through our donations, directly influence the supply of observations and ids.

Personally, I have spent enough time on iNat that I can identify a Rat when I see one.

I can't capture the glory of this in a few pull quotations; you'll have to go there to see the batshit.

(h/t hawkpartys @ tumblr)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] istewart@awful.systems 5 points 19 hours ago

Mr. Blott is what Mr. Bean became when all his old movies started paying streaming royalties

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 2 points 14 hours ago

I actually had to doublecheck context on this but rofldamn this is savage

brava

this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
14 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

1003 readers
40 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS