this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
725 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

67050 readers
6233 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
725
X expands lawsuit over advertiser ‘boycott’ to include Lego, Nestlé, Pinterest, and others | TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)
submitted 1 month ago by moe90@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.world
174 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the attempted argument is anti-competitive collusion among all these companies. That GARM, fundamentally, is illegal as an anti-competitive initiative.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thank you. This is exactly what kind of response I was looking for. I couldn’t find any logic in the argument at all. So essentially the organization is illegal. That at least makes some sense.

Edit: I mean I still think it’s bullshit but I can understand the argument now.