192
submitted 1 year ago by 1984@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

So 4.5 is bad in both of those scenarios? So how is the number of people having rated matter?

Personally I always look further than the AVG number anyway. As other commenters have said none of this means anything if you don't check negative reviews for reoccurring issues.

[-] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 2 points 1 year ago

5.0 ⭐️ (100% 5 stars)

Could be:

5 ⭐️ (1 review)

Or

5 ⭐️ (12,345 reviews)

Knowing the volume provides extra insights. If nothing else, at least when glancing at the list of search results, knowing the volume can allow a slightly faster zero in on the items to dig deeper.

[-] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I agree, just the comment before read as 'i don't trust 5 stars whether it's a lot of votes or very few votes' - so I wasn't sure why it mattered how many votes it had based on the comment.

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
192 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

34892 readers
870 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS