this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
830 points (96.8% liked)

Comic Strips

15340 readers
2244 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Btw, is there a evolutionary cost to creating lactase? Because, why do we stop with it usually and only keep it if it has huge advantages?

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I would guess that humans have been around for what, 250k years? And that the vast majority of that didn't involve a whole lot of milk after age 4.

So it wouldn't have been to much advantage to be able to metabolize lactose.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

No, there is, you get more from your cattle, and on a individual level, less likely to starve.

Keeping Lactase happened at least twice; north europe and a group in west africa.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Sure, if you a) keep mammals around and b) drink their milk. I'm not convinced domesticated animals have been a thing for all that long, evolutionarily. Long enough for some groups to have adapted, sure. We have adaptations for cooked food, too.

[Searches] Cattle probably around 10k years ago.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 3 weeks ago

Saudi Arabia too. I assume that camel milk came in pretty handy in early tribes surviving the deserts.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes. It costs calories and nutrients.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But why then creating lactose in milk at all? Fat alone doesn't suffice?

[–] Floey@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago

It's easy to break down into glucose, which is important for bodily functions. Gluconeogenesis is a thing, but it is inefficient.