this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
1053 points (81.3% liked)

Memes

51000 readers
565 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] words_number@programming.dev 22 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The problem is how do we get there? In a market there will always be actors powerful enough to corrupt the governmenta and influence regulation in an undemocratic way.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Even in a market dominated by socialist companies where workers have power. Workers having ownership isn't some panacea against corruption and willingness to dominate others. You can still end up with a company full of terrible people who have no qualms cornering a market and then committing to rent-extraction. They can even commit to those horrible practices in an internally democratic way!

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago

If the working population is deciding the laws democratically, then there's a good chance of laws against monopolies and trusts being more binding than they are under capitalists, not that I care as much about the co-op model of socialism.

[–] Bobby_DROP_TABLES@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

It's impossible, as has been demonstrated throughout the last few centuries of history. Even in cases where a government makes a massive shift towards a pro-worker position (i.e. the New Deal), over time the country will fall back into regulatory capture and devolve to an oligarchy.