this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
87 points (98.9% liked)
Formula 1
10392 readers
8 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
π F1 Calendar
π FIA Documents
π F1 Pace
2025 Calendar
Location | Date |
---|---|
π¦πΏ Azerbaijan | 19-21 Sep |
πΈπ¬ Singapore | 03-05 Oct |
πΊπΈ United States | 17-19 Oct |
π²π½ Mexico | 24-26 Oct |
π§π· Brazil | 07-09 Nov |
πΊπΈ United States | 20-22 Nov |
πΆπ¦ Qatar | 28-30 Nov |
π¦πͺ Abu Dhabi | 05-07 Dec |
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone: drivers, lemmings etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donβt want to become formuladank.
- No duplicate posts, or posts of different news companies that say the same thing.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm not sure if this is a valid argument, but maybe someone can explain what kind of decisions of FIA would benefit Mercedes AMG F1 (only)?
Innovations such as DAS, Flexi-wings, fuel-rates, mass, etc can be decided in a way as to advantage a particular design philosophy.
The FIA could direct Pirelli to spec tyres that most suit the Mercedes. Back in the day Schumacher benefited greatly from his tyres being specifically designed around his Ferrari, with other teams with the brand having to make do.
Financially, measures such as the capital expenditure cost cap waiver could be wielded to harm the competition.