this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
2064 points (97.1% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

11566 readers
517 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world -5 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

If nobody is allowed to own more than one property, should everyone be forced buy? Where would renters get apartments from?

[–] Xhead 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah, so the government is your landlord now?

It's good, because Americans have so much trust in their government right now.

[–] Xhead 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Good thing I'm not an American.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's handy sometimes, isn't it ;-)

[–] Xhead 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Actually it's a fucking nightmare having your closest neighbour threaten your sovereignty on a daily basis.

It's even worse when half the population actually endorses the behaviour.

I don't hate Americans I'm just disappointed. I hope my children aren't going to die in a trench on the same field I farm

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'm sorry, yeah that must be awful.

It's even worse when half the population actually endorses the behaviour.

Are there a lot of Canadians who support it then?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Look into public housing in Finland.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I am from Finland and public housing is shit.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Public housing was shit, maybe.

Or are all of the articles like this staged? And all of the data is made up?

Since its launch in 2008, the number of homeless people in Finland has decreased by roughly 30%,[1] though other reports indicate it could be up to 50%.[7] The number of long-term homeless people has fallen by more than 35%.[3] "Sleeping rough", the practice of sleeping outside, has been largely eradicated in Helsinki, where only one 50-bed night shelter remains.[3] Analysis of Housing First in Tampere, Finland found that it saved €250,000 in one year.[8] A further study of Finland's Housing First program found that giving a homeless person a home and support resulted in cost savings for the society of at least €15,000 per person per year, with potentially even higher cost savings in the long term.[7] These cost savings for society are in part a result of reductions in usage of emergency healthcare, police, and the justice system when homeless people are given a home.[9]

So they look like link 1, and they result in that... Seems great.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Giving homeless people homes != “public housing”

We do consider having a place to live a human right, but that doesn’t mean the houses are especially good or well maintained compared to commercial options.

They aren’t always even the cheapest - those can usually be found from private renters who own one or two apartments they rent.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

We do consider having a place to live a human right, but that doesn’t mean the houses are especially good or well maintained compared to commercial options.

Ok, so I have your apparent anecdotal experience, vs. hundreds of articles citing a ton of data. I think I'm gonna go with the latter, thanks.

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

Government-provided housing, social housing where your payments get you partial collective ownership, cheaper mortgages now that landlords aren't artificially inflating the rates?

The government. They used to provide housing in the UK and then they stopped and stopped building new houses and now they’re unattainable for most.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No rentals, houses will be gifted to everyone and magically conjured out of thin air.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Your sarcastic inability to see a different path does not mean a different path doesn't exist.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Well, so far all of the "different paths" turned out to be completely crap at working. But surely the next time will do it.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago

...what different paths have been taken? Certainly not enacting a tax code that would make multiple unit ownership progressively unfeasible. That's just a start. Of course, that would take the electorate to actually be educated and informed in their voting and stop reelecting these geriatric ghouls on both sides of the aisle. To be fair (to be faaaiiiirr) I share a lot of your nihilism.