this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
248 points (99.6% liked)

Actually Infuriating

516 readers
1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be CivilPlease treat others with decency. No bigotry (disparaging comments about any race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality, nationality, ability, age, etc). Personal attacks and bad-faith argumentation are not allowed.

Content should be actually infuriatingPolitics and news are allowed, as well as everyday life. However, please consider posting in partner communities below if it is a better fit.

Mark NSFW/NSFL postsPlease mark anything distressing (death, gore, etc.) as NSFW and clearly label it in the title.

Keep it Legal and MoralNo promoting violence, DOXXing, brigading, harassment, misinformation, spam, etc.

Partner Communities

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the most stupid logical flaw about this (it has multiple) is that womens restrooms are stalls only, so there is no way ppl would even notice.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Clearly you're not from the US. We can't afford stall doors without giant gaps.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh it's not a matter of affordability.

Our stalls have giant gaps specifically so people can see inside the stall. You might be doing drugs in there!

Or even worse. You might be hiding your genitalia in there! /s

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

yeah, but ppl are not supposed to peek and if they do, it's their fault if they feel offended and i doubt they'll alert anyone about anything that could also spotlight their indecent behaviour.