this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
254 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38453 readers
411 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Cars should not have software updates

[–] ahal@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Speak for yourself. I think that's one of the things Tesla got right. Cars shouldn't have features locked behind software updates though.

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Lol like Tesla was the first car to update software.

[–] ahal@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean... I still need to go into the dealer to update my 2021 Toyota software. And they certainly don't provide updates for anything other than safety related issues.

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Tesla and Honda are 15 years behind on "tech", thankfully they spent their time on making engines that go 500000 miles

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They should but I'll go one further. Liability should be 100% with the auto manufacturers and car insurance should disappear or be drastically reduced assuming maintenance warranties are met. If I'm buying a FSD car I don't want any liabilities when it comes to safety.

[–] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

100%, the liability issue is the main reason I'm against self driving vehicles.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

Same. Until insurance reforms happen there is no incentive for me to have a self driving car.

[–] balder1993@programming.dev 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is why technically software is a liability. The less code you need, the better, since every line of code is a potential vulnerability and something to maintain, update, etc.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Ideally I don't want my car to be a computer at all, maybe isolated chips to run the abs and such very well defined strictly necessary tasks but that's it. Maybe a company will happen to make a good car at one point in time, but there aren't any companies you can trust not to fuck it up if they have perpetual access to tinker with it.

[–] balder1993@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, none of that would be a problem if the car isn’t connected to anything (WiFi, Bluetooth etc.)