this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
43 points (97.8% liked)

World News

34931 readers
765 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/58151089

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dzso@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Russian and Chinese state media are spending an “eyewatering” £8bn a year, compared with the World Service’s £400m budget.

I mean, yeah, that's kind of concerning. The reality is, whoever invests the most in propaganda is going to win.

[–] marathon01@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago

No organization was spending more on foreign influence and media reportage than USAid. So of course the UK wants to fill the void. They're the voice of Anglo Saxony! They don't speak for this anglo-saxon (by heritage). /s

[–] yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

They're including the entirety of China's media budget.

While I agree things like npr, pbs, and local newspapers are propaganda, you guys typically don't. So it's silly to compare the two like that.

It's like saying the entirety of the UK's tv license fee is just for state run propaganda; and that's not fair, channel 4 exists and works against UK state propaganda.