this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
20 points (95.5% liked)
Thrash Metal
263 readers
5 users here now
Place to post and discuss THRASH METAL!
RULES (MUST READ):
- Please keep things relevant to thrash (death thrash, blackened thrash, crossover, speed metal etc. are permitted). While we understand it is subjective, if a moderator believes a song to stray too far from thrash, it will likely be locked. Please do not take this personally. Repeat offenders may see posts removed.
- Please search before posting a song, do not repeat posts.
- Friendly debate is encouraged.
- When posting a song use the format of "Band - Song [FFO: band1, band2]". This just helps keep things uniform. The "FFO" (For Fans Of) section is optional. It is for lesser known bands. (Stole this idea from the Death Metal community).
- No racist, sexist, blah blah blah... you get the idea. This is not the place to discuss sensitive matters.
- No NSFW content (apart from songs/album covers. If they do include NSFW content, please mark the posts as such).
- Post in English only (obviously you can post songs in different languages).
- But most of all have fun XD.
Show support to our friends: !metal@lemmy.world !death_metal@lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There's definitely more listed there than I thought lmao. I think imo you'd get more out of doing discography reviews of older stuff, like how the Megadeth review eventually turned positive in the end. Older stuff has been around for longer (duh) but also has more exposure, therefore more open to a wider array of opinions. Perhaps, anyway lol.
Yeah that makes sense, the older stuff has had more time to change. Ig it doesn't make much sense to review new bands who have maybe only released one or two albums, which haven't changed over time.