this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
362 points (98.7% liked)

World News

44918 readers
6190 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's crazy this article mentions these Russian refugees as potential spies when it tends to be Americans being paid by Russia that do the most damage. I'm not even thinking of Trump!

[–] Sundiata@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

your thinking of Krasnov. They both look and act the same. Coincidence?

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I was thinking of Robert Hanssen. Most of the spies just end up being double agents.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who do you think is contacting the Americans?

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People on the Internet, it's ridiculously easy to do it compared to spy movie meetings in person, leaving a newspaper on certain park benches with certain letters highlighted or things like that.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They just talk in person. No one is really listening.

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why? End to end encryption is a real thing, look at all the planning for 9/11 that was done on AOL chat rooms or instant messenger using burner accounts, way back in the day. Nowadays there are so many ways to be anonymous online, e2e encryption apps, vpns, the mass of forums and ways to temporarily setup email, it's insanity to think the primary way a foreign nation would spy is to go through the trouble of having individuals apply for refuge or asylum status just to try and recruit American officials to spy

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I honestly don't know shit about this stuff. However, I'm guessing they do both. Online they flood people hoping someone will bite. But, I'm guessing it's with it to send people, as they are probably a thousand times more successful. Plus they can target a specific person that might be "immune" to online methods. This is pure speculation, as I've never studied it or looked into it. I could be completely off base.