this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
785 points (98.4% liked)

World News

44510 readers
3111 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

I find this difficult to believe. Edit: Wikipedia has a total (both sides) death toll of 160k-290k.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

regardless of the total number there are combat footage videos of entire platoons getting obliterated

[–] philpo@feddit.org 28 points 2 days ago

Casualties != Death

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

See first comment, 900K include wounded too.

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 1 points 19 hours ago

Seriously wounded.

There are also slight wounds, which number at around 10 000 per day on average (according to a Russian source that I read two-three days ago). Remember that this number includes everything, including getting a paper cut in your finger, so the same person can end up in that number several times per month.

The number of Russian military losses consists of wounded by a bit under ⅔ of the number. The wound gets included in the number only if its severe enough to permanently remove you from the front.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As always that this topic gets discussed: dead and wounded

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Title says "lost". I took that to mean killed.

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Many do. But, in military purposes, it is not really relevant whether your army loses a soldier through death or through a severe permanent wound. He is still a soldier that you cannot use at the front.

It's a standard practice to count the dead and permanently wounded in the same number, because that's what is militarily relevant.

[–] doo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

This difficulty to believe it's actually quite fundamental to what's happening.

If you like, I invite you to imagine what would be the explanation if these numbers were true. (Even adjusted for being dead and wounded)

[–] niomi@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

IDK but seems probable if anybody on earth can take large amount of casualties, might be the Russians

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 1 points 19 hours ago

Yup. They do have that feature.

As do Ukrainians. Which causes it to be a detrimental feature for both sides. If only one side had that, then it would be of advantage.