this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
428 points (99.5% liked)

Europe

4740 readers
2443 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Preparations are under way for a rocket test flight in Norway that could make history and give Europe greater independence from the market leader in orbital launches, the United States.

Isar Aerospace says it is planning to launch on 24 March between 12.30pm and 3.30pm CET, weather permitting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] petrescatraian@libranet.de 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Weren't we already launching rockets from the French Guiana?

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We do, but this is about continental Europe.

[–] K4mpfie@feddit.org 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Okay but why do we need that? As I read it Europa had a spaceport, now we have a second one, now what? I mean there was a reason to launch from SA and not Europe, right?

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Mhm I guess it would reduce transport cost of the equipment you want to launch as you don't have to ferry it down to French Guiana first.

[–] olosta@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Launching from Norway over the ocean means launching due north or slightly west (the spaceport website says 90 to 110° inclination). West is the "wrong" way for fuel efficiency (probably not so important at these high inclination). These polar orbit are more useful for low earth orbit (earth observation mainly), a satellite can change its inclination but that's more fuel and less useful payload mass. With inclination change, the site could be used to launch constellations.

Big communication satellite need to launch at lower inclination (closer to the equator and due east).

So it makes sense only for some use case, but it's great to see redundancies. And if it works well, maybe some day they could get a pas in french Guyana.

[–] tristipasta@feddit.org 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but the news is that they are now launching from the European continent, making everything much cheaper because you don't have to transport rockets and payloads around the world.

[–] petrescatraian@libranet.de 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

@tristipasta I thought it was more effective to launch the rockets from as close to the Equator as possible, as the gravitational field is less strong and so you need less fuel to take off.

That's why US also launches rockets from Florida and the USSR and later Russia used/uses the Baikonur facility in Kazahstan.

[–] tristipasta@feddit.org 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

True, but the primary advantage comes from the Earth's rotational speed rather than a significantly weaker gravitational field. The Earth's rotation provides an additional velocity boost to rockets, which helps reduce the fuel needed to reach orbit.

However, your remark is valid and is also addressed in the article (in the part behind the paywall):

Rockets launching close to the equator get a boost. Thanks to the planet's spin, they start out travelling much faster relative to the centre of Earth than rockets launching near the poles.

Andøya Space Center is located at 69° north, so Earth's rotational speed is considerably weaker there than in French Guiana. But this isn't important for high-inclination orbits: those that make a bigger angle with the equator.

Isar Aerospace says it will be able to put 1500-kilogram payloads into orbit up to 30 times a year, in orbital inclinations from 90° to 110.6º. This would include sun-synchronous orbits - those that always pass over a given point at the same local time - which are ideal for spy and weather satellites. Isar already has a contract to put Arctic Ocean surveillance satellites into just such an orbit for the Norwegian Space Agency.

The launch site is also reasonably free of air and marine traffic, and it benefits from all the infrastructure needed for small launch vehicles. "It will be more limited in terms of what you can achieve, but it's still, I think, reasonable," says Amato.

[–] petrescatraian@libranet.de 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

@tristipasta@feddit.org wrote:

True, but the primary advantage comes from the Earth's rotational speed rather than a significantly weaker gravitational field. The Earth's rotation provides an additional velocity boost to rockets, which helps reduce the fuel needed to reach orbit.

Right, that was it!

So this means that they will only do launches during a specific time of the year?

[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You can launch to sun-synchronous orbits at all parts of the year. The satellite will orbit around once per 24 hours and so return to the same place at the same time everyday. So you just have to match when you launch with the time of day.

I got it now. Thanks!