91
submitted 1 year ago by shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Do you want a Constitutional Amendment? Because that's how you get a Constitutional Amendment.

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's no chance of that happening. There have been no amendments in over 30 years. And no amendments that weren't a joke in over 50 years. You won't get 3/4 of the states to agree to anything the least bit controversial.

(You won't even get "just" 2/3 of the House and Senate to agree to even propose the amendment.)

Yeah, no, we shouldn't have a constitutional amendment for that. We cannot and should not try to control the climate, we can merely control our contributions to global pollution. And contributing to global pollution isn't Constitution territory, but regulation territory.

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
91 points (85.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7213 readers
378 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS