this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
1 points (60.0% liked)

Clown Population

102 readers
361 users here now

Clown Population. The clowns inside the White House are only a small fraction of a total society of mock for mock, reactionary mocking, clowns. The entire nation is a "basket case of clowning around" on social machines / HDTV media machines / mockery.

People like to play a game of psychological denial and say ONLY MAGA is the clowns, only the White House is the clowns. It's the entire population of Untied States of America.

founded 2 weeks ago
MODERATORS
 

Claims being made: Operation Matthew 4:19

  1. Billionaires met in November 2013

  2. one month later announced in December 2013 that they were going to troll the entire world (over gender)

  3. AFTER the start of New Year 2014, AFTER the November 2013 meetings and December 2013 trolling operation announcement: to wage war against Ukraine

  4. The Matthew 4:19 trolling operation planned in 2013 would not end, as was published in 2014 "The underlying aim, Surkov says, is not to win the war, but to use the conflict to create a constant state of destabilized perception, in order to manage and control."

 

Operation Matthew 4:19 was initiated in March 2013 even before November 2013 meeting.

  1. Some even claim that the World Wide Web trolling operation by billionaires against everyday people was initiated via Twitter in November 2012, a year before the billionaires met in November 2013 - the first claim, #1 on list above

  2. The World Wide social media trolling operation was launched on the Web in early 2013 but not reported in Western news sources until middle of year 2014

 

“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” ― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, 1995

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

they were going to troll the entire world (over gender)

Where do you find that? None of the articles you linked mention gender and yet the claim seems to pivot this whole thread.

Also, I can't find anything about Operation Matthew 4:19 anywhere. Not in the articles you linked or through DDG. Did you come up with it?

[–] RoundSparrow@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Did you come up with it?

Yes.

None of the articles you linked mention gender and yet the claim seems to pivot this whole thread.

The top list, number 2 on the top list says: "one month later announced in December 2013 that they were going to troll the entire world (over gender)"

the linked article: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/12/vladimir-putin-conservative-icon/282572/

At the top the 2013 article says: "The Kremlin leader's full-throated defense of Russia's "traditional values" and his derision of the West's "genderless and infertile" liberalism"

Later in the article it says: "The speech came on the heels of the appointment of Dmitry Kiselyov—the television anchor who has said the hearts of gays and lesbians who die should be buried or burned—as head of the new Kremlin-run media conglomerate Rossia Segodnya."

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (158 children)

Yeah, I read the whole thing and all of the other articles in full but I don't see what you see. "Gays & lesbians" is about sexual orientation and not (trans)gender. Mind you, I know bigoted politicians are willfully stupid in this regard, but still, the articles barely mention gender at all the way both the title and the body of the post make it seem. I went in looking for that specifically but didn't find much of anything.

I don't mean to say the links aren't good or that the gender wedge issue isn't playing a part--they are--but your synthesis feels off. Idk, maybe I'm missing some more context?

load more comments (158 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)