this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
247 points (99.6% liked)

Futurology

2439 readers
231 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Now how in the hell is female sterilization not 100%?

[–] vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Even after tubal litigation it's possible to still get pregnant if the fallopian tubes grow back together or if another tube/path forms. It's somewhat rare (0.5% of women who have had the procedure could get pregnant again)

Yeah sure but that's not what sterilisation means. To be sterile means you're not making any gametes whatsoever, which typically means a complete removal of the gonads (ie an oophrectomy or orchidectomy). Otherwise you're not sterile, you're just infertile.

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Isn't there a chance vasectomies don't take either?

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

It's a lot easier to double check in men.

[–] legion02@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It's almost 100% because "proper usage" includes periodic checks.

[–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But the same thing can happen with vasectomies so why isn't it showing anything there?

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Vasectomies are a lot easier to double check. A woman released 1 egg a month. A man released a LOT of swimmers every shot. Go in a cup and check for swimmers.

[–] str82L@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Guessing it's more female "sterilization"

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I remember hearing that in rare cases, getting their tubes tied can actually heal.