this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
433 points (97.8% liked)

Greentext

5968 readers
1639 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 26 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Ah.. It's fair? If wealth isn't distributed well, blaming radical ideas will only fuel the fire. Solution is a much deeper one no one wants to invest into.

[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 24 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I can call it a really stupid take while also acknowledging we need deep systemic change.

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I meant it's fair from a common man perspective where the laws might protect you from corporate greed

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Burn the world down and build it back fresh and new. It’s a great strategy when you don’t ask who is building it back and what are their goals? Nobody should ever trust Trump or any other billionaire to be that person.

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 9 hours ago

Yes, the right idea with worst case motive

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 3 points 13 hours ago

It's the right formula, but the wrong results.