Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
I wouldn't say capitalism is good, but the alternatives we've discovered so far are either unworkable or worse.
Capitalism emerged at a time when Feudalism / Manorialism was the norm. In a Feudalist society, lords owned the land, and serfs belonged to the land. Workers were required to work on the land allocated to them for their entire lives, and their children were bound to the same land. There was no incentive for anyone to innovate or improve efficiency because there was no competition.
Capitalism was an improvement on that system. At least under capitalism, workers could move to another capitalist's factory. At least there was competition so there were incentives to improve efficiency, and maybe sometimes to improve working conditions so that workers were more willing to work in that factory. Also, at least in theory, people weren't assigned "factory owner" and "worker" titles at birth. It was difficult, but at least possible for a worker (or group of workers) to start a new factory. And, a badly run factory could result in a factory owner becoming just a worker.
Capitalism is better than feudalism, and better than the systems that came before feudalism which were mostly slavery-based and/or violence-based (obviously there's a lot of overlap there).
Then, there are theoretical alternatives to capitalism which don't actually seem to work in the real world, at least on a large scale. Collectivist things sound great in theory, but in practice almost always seem to result in oligarchs or dictators taking over. Also, because economic systems and political systems are intertwined, collectivist systems without centralized decision making power are vulnerable to being invaded by neighbours who are centralized and organized. AFAIK, we've never seen a collectivist system able to fend off invasions and keep operating in a collectivist way.
As a result, capitalism is the best solution we've been able to come up with so far that takes human nature into account and is stable over hundreds of years. But, the best capitalist systems are heavily regulated ones where the accompanying political system is constantly working to reduce the power of the people who get rich via capitalism. The capitalists hate that, and want a system where they get all the power, without realizing that effectively transforms the system into a dictatorship / oligarchy, which isn't a good system even for the capitalists. But, oh well.