this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
361 points (96.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

33701 readers
687 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sure, playing chess needs intelligence, dedication, and good chess players are smarter than an average person. But it's waaaay exaggerated in movies. I'm a math researcher, and in any movie, my department will be full of chess geniuses. But in reality, only about 10% of them even play chess.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I'm not the guy you're replying to, but it is a bad analogy since learning to read a language leads to more exciting things, even if you don't enjoy reading books. You can communicate, do science, watch movies with subs etc. But learning chess does not make you good at anything else. (Tbh, I'm speaking out of my ass here, and will stand corrected if presented with research showing otherwise.)

[–] WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

Your points are correct but I think you misunderstand what my analogy was intended to do. None of this makes it a bad analogy.

I don't disagree with you that reading opens the doors to so many other things than chess does.

I also never intended to imply chess is a transferable skill. Chess skill, for matters of this discussion, could be entirely useless outside of the specific context of a chess game.

The reason i made the analogy betwen learning to read and reading for fun is because I'm trying to illustrate the difference of 500 ELO chess and 2500 ELO chess.

If you play 500 ELO chess you DO NOT KNOW what 2500 ELO chess is, you could not explain the reasons behind a single move which is made in strategy, you can barely identify how to move your horse.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 0 points 4 days ago

That's part of my point. If we were talking about painting then the skills might well be useful for other stuff, but everything I've read says that it's just a game. It doesn't build other useful skills.