this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
88 points (94.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4053 readers
181 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] libra00@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We didn't have 50 nukes in WW2, we barely had a couple and each one took weeks or even months to build because we just couldn't produce U-235/Pu-239 very quickly at the time. We might've been able to make 50 nukes had the war gone on twice as long as it did, assuming Germany didn't kick-start their own development after seeing them used and lob one at DC or NYC or something first.