this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
88 points (94.0% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
4053 readers
181 users here now
Rules:
- Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
- No spam or soliciting for money.
- No racism or other bigotry allowed.
- Obviously nothing illegal.
If you see these please report them.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
We didn't have 50 nukes in WW2, we barely had a couple and each one took weeks or even months to build because we just couldn't produce U-235/Pu-239 very quickly at the time. We might've been able to make 50 nukes had the war gone on twice as long as it did, assuming Germany didn't kick-start their own development after seeing them used and lob one at DC or NYC or something first.