this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
1220 points (95.5% liked)

Fuck AI

2486 readers
1790 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then don't gatekeep e.g. your naked body and your loved one's secrets! Information should always be fee and all forms of controlling it is folly! Do it. While you are at it, your, and your family's, full name and place of employment please. Thanks!

Oh wait, you don't want to do that right? Some information is private. You have some rights on some information. Ok then let's talk about it.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not what we are talking about. But you know that. Do you want to explain how to police public information without it being folly?

[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

We are talking about access to information and you said that it should be granted to everyone without any limitations. How are we not talking about that information?

Unless you are to finally admit that there is different kind of information and different rules that we apply to them, We are talking about your nudes too.

When you finally admit that, then we can have a discussion about what rules we apply to information. Then we can talk about "public information". Until then, I don't know what to tell you.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I work with ip and still think it is folly. Idk why you spam about private information, that's not what anyone was asking or discussing about

[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You talked about information. Not public, not private, information.

Your responses heavily imply that you think public and private information should be treated differently, but you keep talking about how information should be free and open. So you are willing and believing that there are rules. So why shouldn't public information be public information while not being allowed to use for e.g. ai without permission? You can allow copying and modifying of information without allowing e.g. it being used for ai training. You can make that rule, just like you can different rules for private information than for public information.

I really don't understand what you don't understand.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Put it out and it's public. At that point it is folly to regulate. If personal information is taken and spread, the culprit has committed a crime but in my opinion the rest is folly. I thought it was obvious so I omitted the intensely self explanatory details

[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 hours ago

Oh so it is a crime! So you totally could make it illegal to use public information to train ai without consent. Making it really difficult to collect billions in funding. Thanks for the admission.