this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
739 points (99.1% liked)

politics

23101 readers
4262 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bill Maher has come in for tons of criticism since he opted to have dinner with Donald Trump, but none of it was as biting as a recent takedown by "Seinfeld" creator Larry David.

In an essay for the New York Times called "My Dinner With Adolf," David took Maher to task for attempting to soften the image of a fascist strongman. While David never mentions the "Real Time" host by name, the timing of the piece and its main character's need to hear out all sides past the point of ludicrousness make the target clear.

David's fictional meeting with Adolf Hitler echoes many of the points that Maher has made in the days since he dined with Trump. Maher, a crochety liberal-leaning comic who has grown more crochety and less liberal as societal norms have passed him by, marvelled at the fact that he could make the commander-in-chief laugh.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't tell you how many times I've had MAGA Morons tell me that HitlerPig has always been worshipped in NYC, even claiming that he's ALWAYS been the "King Of New York City."

I've always told them that its obvious that theyve never set foot in NYC, nor ever spoken to a New Yorker, because there isnt a single person who would ever have a good thing to say about him. He has been reviled since he first became a public figure.

Literally EVERYONE in NYC despises him.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It cuts across all classes. The truly rich despise him. When he was building his Tower, he had a golden opportunity to preserve the original building. This was at a time when Jackie Kennedy was pushing to keep the classic NYC buildings safe. Even his own architect told him to keep the old façade and build around it. Instead he demolished it AFTER he'd promised not to. Then there was the time he brought the Plaza Hotel and had to sell at a huge loss because he couldn't finance it. And that's not even half of what I could tell...

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, I'm well aware.

The destruction of that building facade was even worse than that. When it became clear that he wouldn't preserve the facade, there were many that were willing to pay to remove iconic architectural/ 1sculptural elements and send them to museums, but he ordered his construction crew to simply destroy them.

As a person whose job partially consists of brand marketing, I see that as a great marketing opportunity for his brand image that he absolutely blew. He could have played along, let those architectural elements be removed to museums on someone else's dime, as he stood out front, bloviating to the media that he is so proud to be the leader in preserving the iconic architectural history of the great city that he loves so much, and improving his standing with the city and its citizens. Instead, it was just "Fuck it, just destroy it all."

And yeah, I'm well aware of his past, like his demand that the "Central Park Five" be executed, and when they were fully exonerated of the crime, he STILL insisted they be executed. It was then that I knew this psychopath could never be allowed to hold public office.

Now he's sending innocent people to a torture gulag in a 3rd world country without Due Process, and people are surprised that he won't lift a finger to correct their "administrative mistakes." History rhymes again.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

John Baron is good friends with Ron Varo.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Ron Varo.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/04/09/peter-navarro-pseudonym-ron-vara/

This shit is turning my hair white.

Just when you think that they can't top Four Seasons Landscaping, they strap on a jet pack.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What was the name of the original building so I can look it up?

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaellisicky/2020/10/03/how-donald-trump-took-down-bonwit-teller-a-fifth-avenue-landmark/

Here's an entire article, including Trump using Polish immigrant workers like slaves, and a guest appearance by John Baron