this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
235 points (95.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4245 readers
238 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

But how do you get the crewed aircraft to hold still long enough?

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Drones could act as automated movable flack. Just get a bunch to get near the flight path and explode. There are definitely drones with a range way over 1 mile.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Or put some pieces of high-carbon steel/titanium on the drone and just let them get sucked into the intake.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The range needed could be 30.000 feet ...

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

the US arguably lost the VN war because they kept expecting the VK to fight like the US

why would you try to counter the jet at 30k feet?

a jet takes so long to build and so much to maintain the supply chain is super vulnerable

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Making a cloud of drone flak is very cheap and easy and can take out multiple types of threats. They talk to each other and act as a redundant pinpoint targeting system.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Boom a cheap EMP blast takes out all your 700 drones.

It's a never ending battle.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Faraday cages on the drones electronics. Battle continues

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Bigger more expensive EMP burns through your more expensive MYLAR caged drones.

Battle continues.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Bigger faraday cage and larger battery

Battle continues

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The drones are now the size of the fighter jets 🤔

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The fighter jets now have to get more EMP protection too, and are gitting bigger.

The fight continues

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But that EMP blast also destroys any electronic hardware (radios, NVG, etc) that your good guys have on them as well

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Puts more mylar in plane.

The battle continues.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

what kind of up time do they have

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I imagine a drone built for this could be an hour or two as some return to charge periodically on specific areas under protection.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think we are going to be getting to a point where signal jamming is going to become a more critical part of warfare. A military base isn't going to allow any kind of transmission to occur nearby in order to protect itself.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is why laser targeting is a thing. Cant jam a laser beam.

[–] guy@piefed.social 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

smoke barriers has entered the discussion

[–] Steve@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

slight breeze counters your defence

[–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What about those smoke machines from discos? Just put 5% of the military budget into permanent smoke generators. And of course additionally 2% for speakers to create a creepy ambiance

[–] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago

So THAT'S why the war simulator games from the early 2000s had all those fog of war simulations going! It wasn't rendering distance capabilities at all!