this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
1428 points (98.4% liked)

Facepalm

3118 readers
434 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TranscriptA threads post saying "There has never been another nation ever that has existed much beyond 250 years. Not a single one. America's 250th year is 2025. The next 4 years are gonna be pretty interesting considering everything that's already been said." It has a reply saying "My local pub is older than your country".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Sure... Gaza is worse off that Hiroshima and Nagasaki!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War_casualties

A 1975 U.S. Senate subcommittee estimated around 1.4 million civilian casualties in South Vietnam because of the war, including 415,000 deaths. An estimate by the Department of Defense after the war gave a figure of 1.2 million civilian casualties, including 195,000 deaths

The Israel-Hamas war has less than 0.003% of the casualties the US inflicted on Vietnam. That's not to say the Israel-Hamas War isn't a bad thing (all wars are) but just trying to snap you back from historical revisionism.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Vietnam had 16 times the population of Gaza at the time. So your 1.4 million ends up being 87,500 if you keep the ratio and that's over 20 years. Israel has passed 50,000 in less then 2 years.

Also, the fact that you can compare the current situation to what happened in Vietnam and Japan should give you a hint that you are defending the wrong party. This is far from the win you think it is. Defending those things would be unimaginable, you should think about what that means.

It's not the Israel-Hamas War, it's the genocide of the Palestinian people by a vile warmongering apartheid state.

[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I wouldn't say casualties really matter when it comes to genocide, what matters is the intent. The US were quite happy to wipe out the Native Americans and didn't exactly cry any tears as they did it, to the point where wiping out the Native Americans was such a sticking point to them that Britain demanding they not expand into Native American territory was actually a contributing factor to the Revolutionary War.

The Israelis pretend they aren't interested in wiping out the Palestinians, but they aren't exactly stopping the settlements driving out the remaining Palestinians and they're certainly pretty keen on ensuring no Palestinian returns to Gaza when they inevitably annex the place. The intent is there, it's just obfuscated.

I'd say they're pretty similar, at least in terms of intent. Both nations want to expand because they believe it's their god-given right to have that land, and the natives to that land need to either accept it or be 'removed'.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm on your side, 95% of the way but I don't think it's fair to the victims in Japan, Vietnam, Palestine etc to be part of a ranking. Just like there are bigger and smaller infinities, there are larger and smaller amounts of casualties. But in comparison to large and small infinities, those numbers do not show the hurt these people went true. In Japan for example, some died in an instant where others went through decades of physical decay because of the damage radiation did. How can that be put in numbers and compared to what happened to people in Vietnam for example.

You can leave out a comparison with a 'sure...you must have forgotten Hiroshima, Nagasaki and the 1.4 million civilian casualties in South Vietnam because of the war, including 415,000 deaths' for example.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

He is arguing in bad faith. His only goal is to make the actions of the state of Israel seem less extreme. That's why he fails to mention the population differences and keeps using the term "Israel-Hamas war".

If you check the modlog you find gems like:

The use of the word genocide is political.

Until that happens, Gaza should be treated like any fascist state that throws rockets at its neighbor.

[–] KurtVonnegut@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

Thanks for checking that out

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Thanks, noted.

Gaza should be treated like any fascist state that throws rockets at its neighbor.

0 fucks given for actual people living there indeed. Wow.