this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
856 points (98.3% liked)

Transgender

605 readers
1238 users here now

Overview:

The Lemmy place to discuss the news and experiences of transgender people.


Rules:

  1. Keep discussions civil.

  2. Arguments against transgender rights will be removed.

  3. No bigotry is allowed - including transphobia, homophobia, speciesism, racism, sexism, classism, ableism, castism, or xenophobia.

Shinigami Eyes:

Extension for Quickly Spotting Transphobes Online.

Shinigami Eyes

spoiler iphone: unofficial workaround to use extension Install the Orion browser then add the extension. :::

Related:!lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone

!intersex@lemmy.blahaj.zone


founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

This guy just keeps getting more and more wonderful ❤️

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 22 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

I'm not a fan of Harry Potter, and don't like Rowling, but I read that whole damn essay and was not at all convinced. Half the examples could be said to be plagiarising each other by the standard they're using. They say at the start the coincidences are too strong to be attributed to tropes, but I really disagree with that. Almost everything they list are common tropes, many even outside magical wizard settings. Mean adoptive family? Did she also plagiarise Cinderella?

Sure, her books generally aren't original themes, but to say they're so similar that they are direct plagiarism is a real stretch in my opinion. Especially when you have to list like 30 books that have one or two things in common each, and mostly in a general sense.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Exactly. It shouldn't be considered a crime to use and build on eternal tropes. That's what culture is about. The terrible things about JKR lie elsewhere.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 3 points 11 hours ago

I never thought she was a plagiarist, just a hack.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

The first two or three books felt far more like a Roald Dahl novel than any standard issue YA novel.

She's clearly been influenced by other children's books. But yeah, so much of the "Rowling plagiarized!" critique boils down to how bland and generic the story was.