this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
97 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

432 readers
170 users here now

A community for news and discussion about the hardware side of technology.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Almost every smartphone usb port is 2.0 as well. USB C is just a connector folks.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I thought USB c ports were generally 3.0?

[–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Usb C has pins for both 3.x/4 and separate ones for usb 2.0. Many devices just hook up the 2.0 lines and call it a day, because parts that can actually handle 3.0+ are rare and expensive.

Companies making USB capable parts typically contract out or buy the section of their chip which handles USB or other things like ethernet (Intellectual property cores or IP core) already designed as a drop in part of the semiconductor.. This usually is under some form of contract / nda + they pay a big fee, so the parts are expensive and documentation can be tough to acquire without yourself signing NDA and being a company looking to use their ICs.

USB 2.0 is much simpler and cheaper to deal with and cant handle as much bandwidth, but thats typically acceptable for simple electronics.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 5 points 8 hours ago

So the USB connector and the USB protocol are different, and not necessarily related to each other - however there is a functional upper limit to the throughput that a given connector type can support (you'll never get USB 3.0 data transfer through a USB Mini connector).

A type C connector might only be wired to USB 2.0-level hardware on the back - but this is not really a bad thing. There are lots of low-level electronic devices that need a USB connector that don't really need 3.0 data transfer, and faster data processing chips are more expensive, but it's convenient to only need one type of cable for everything.

There are some nice reference tables in the Wikipedia article: USB Hardware

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

on a pc, yes, they are generally are some sort of usb 3 (like 3.2 gen 1 or gen 2).

as a connector, though, usb type-c is used for more than just usb.