this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
25 points (85.7% liked)

Casual Conversation

3186 readers
579 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We've all met one, whose the worst you've met?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah. It does feel like some places have never had to confront racism and work through it in the same way America has (not that we're doing a great job 😬😬😬🥲). America has a LOOONG history of acute racism, but it's also been a cultural conversation here more than I think it has been in a lot of other places.

It seems to me like it kinda manifests differently here and some people assume the outwards, acute image of racism they imagine in America is the only way it can look, and there's no need to reflect on how they themselves relate to race. Or maybe that racism is mostly about mistreatment of black folks, and they never make the connection to their gross assumptions and internalized "othering" of other demographics. Racism comes in a lot of different flavors and intensities, whether it's acute hatred, or gross subtext that shows you the assumptions someone has made about people who look differently than themselves.

I'm sorry to hear you've dealt with so much gross behavior in Canada, that's always a sadening thing. Sending love from one of your neighbors down south, take care!

[–] ZDL@ttrpg.network 1 points 6 hours ago

Thanks. I'm sorry you're going through all that shit you're going through right now Down South™. 😥