this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
459 points (98.3% liked)

politics

23300 readers
3455 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's also on her YouTube channel LINK HERE.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Performative. No meaningful action.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

For the people screaming for the Dems to do something: this is it. This is the extent of their power with the number of votes they have. If anything, we should be urging Republican lawmakers to abandon ship.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How about getting a filing of an impeachment notion going? No doubt it'd fail, but it goes on record and everyone who voted against it gets listed. Keep it going and you see the pattern by the time the midterms come around?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Shri Thanedar filed 7 articles this month alone, Al Green filed several back in February.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Not sure what you’re thinking is going to happen right now when dems are a minority in the house and senate.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What did Mitch McConnell do when the Democrats had a supermajority under Obama, sit with his thumb up his ass?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

He filibustered.

Cabinet Appointments cannot be filibustered under current senate rules. Same for SCOTUS judges.

He did filibuster Public Option into the grave, though.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Since when did the Republicans give two shits about some bullshit "senate rules?" They just change that shit whenever it suits them.

So do the same.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Sure that's a swell plan, sport.

You only need a simple majority to change senate rules, so you need to convince 4 Republican Senators and 2 Independents, and I think there are maybe 1 or 2 Democrats who might need some arm twisting.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mitch McConnell had the benefit of dealing with weak, spineless Dem weenies who would roll over for him, even though they had majorities.

MAGA Nazis aren't going to be cooperative.

Well it's a sure thing that nothing will happen if they don't try.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

be specific. he also wanted obama to have a single term. That didn't happen.

The Republicans broke the record for obstruction under Obama. We need that to happen right now under Trump.

We need a left Tea Party.

[–] AlbertSpangler 1 points 1 day ago

See, your whole "right now" thing is a worry. It implies a belief that the Democrats will ever be allowed any semblance of power in the future.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Get the impeachment going. Even if it fails (it will), the members who vote against it will be noted in time for the time of the midterms. Do it a few times and you can establish a pattern.

[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

people are just pissed and venting about past inaction, is it useful? no, but I think the frustration of your country turning to fascism after Bernie's electoral chances were sabotaged is understandable

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

wtf?

Bernie ran in pretty successful but also lost the primaries by some pretty sizeable margins.

[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

i actually didn't read into it, I've just always heard the narrative that the DNC snubbed Bearnie, did the propaganda catch me?

You just described her whole political career.