this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
768 points (98.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6487 readers
891 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
768
The Myth of Plastic Recycling. (slrpnk.net)
submitted 1 day ago by Pro@programming.dev to c/climate@slrpnk.net
80 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gi1242@lemmy.world 32 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

there have been several articles exposing plastic recycling as green washing. unfortunately they never make it to mainstream media

https://www.npr.org/2022/10/24/1131131088/recycling-plastic-is-practically-impossible-and-the-problem-is-getting-worse

i saw a chart somewhere showing less than 1% of plastic in use today is recycled but I can't find it now

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 16 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Sad that NPR is not considered "mainstream" these days. Maybe Joe Rogan will post something to Facebook about it?

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 13 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

NPR is definitely mainstream

I think the word you're looking for is "corporate" or "for-profit". Thats what they're not.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

fwiw I agree, but it doesn't appear to be considered mainstream by the guy I was replying to.

[–] gi1242@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

ha. i was wrong. NPR has 44 million weekly listeners. that probably qualifies as mainstream media.

I thought npr had 10 times fewer listeners than that. (fyi NPR is the only radioi listen to)

https://blog.marketenginuity.com/by-the-numbers-who-is-actually-listening-to-public-radio

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 1 hour ago

I thought npr had 10 times fewer listeners

If you want to be depressed, Joe Rogan has 10 times that for single episodes.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Was it ever? It seems substantially more popular now than it used to be 20 years ago, with them getting in on the ground floor of the podcast game and all.

[–] namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

unfortunately they never make it to mainstream media

Sounds like this "mainstream media" is not doing its job. This might have some kinds of implications for the current state of affairs in the USA. Can't put my finger on exactly what though.